TV Review: Stargate Universe – Pilot (#2)
Sci-Fi Reviews, Sci-Fi TV News, Stargate: Universe TV Series — By endymi0n on October 3, 2009
I am just about a Stargate virgin. I have seen the first movie, starring Kurt Russell and James Spader and I liked it. It had a cool concept and I really liked the whole Egyptian mythic tie-in. Since that movie it just hasn’t been on the radar. I’m sorry. I’ve been a very, very, bad Sci-Fi blogger.
But I am trying to mend my ways. After the spiffy Battlestar Galactica, I have been taking my SyFy channel programs much more seriously. To be honest, I really didn’t, really pay attention to the new Universe until I heard that Robert Carlyle was involved in the show. My little pointy ears drew erect at this news. Robert Carlyle is a feature movie actor and I think a guy with a ton of character. Robert has gravitas. That’s not to say that the rest of the cast is chopped liver. Once I got on the Google it seemed to me that SyFy was taking this Stargate up another level in the acting quality. Alongside Mr. Carlyle we have Lou Diamond Phillips as Colonel David Telford, Ming Na as Camile Wray and Justin Louis as Colonel Everett Young as those among the actors I instantly recognized.
The early vibe I got in the previews and the endless Robert Carlyle interviews I watched told me “Stargate: Universe” was going with what we, the larger Sci-Fi watching and loving, populace wanted. Make it darker, make it desperate, make it adult or in other words, make it BattleStar Galactica. This was the inevitable course of things. The Sci-Fi destiny of Universe so to speak.
Ok, so here’s the setup. We have a group of people visiting a newly found Stargate someplace hell and gone. Among the group we have Robert Carlyle playing the fiendishly complex Dr. Nicholas Rush, a guy seemingly obsessed about getting this found Stargate to give up it’s last level and tune in to destinations previously unreachable by other Stargates. Dr. Rush seems pretty OCD about this project. He seems perhaps motivated by other, at present unseen pressures. The plot is further illuminated by a tender moment between Dr. Rush and a photograph of himself and a female person. Dr. Rush feels the pain. Will this woman in the picture somehow be connected to Dr. Rush’s obsession with the Stargate’s unlocked level? Perhaps Dr. Rush needs to get himself to a distant place for romantic reasons. There are plenty of complex emotions tied up in a love story, with vengeance, grief and guilt among them.
I think further illuminating Dr. Rush’s increased interest in the gate is his recruitment of Eli Wallace, played by David Blue, a couch loving gamer dude that has solved a math problem critical to unlocking the Stargate that has been hidden in an online game by Dr. Rush. Dr. Rush could not solve the problem himself or at least not within the foreseeable future. A very visibly frustrated Dr. Rush drags the kid along to the Stargate to I guess let him in on what his math solving skills hath wrought. I’m not really sure what the kid is doing there or what his role in the continuing endeavour really is about. When he shows up to see the Stargate, Dr. Rush seems to think it’s all in hand.
The creators of Stargate, again in the Battlestar theme, are going for a more realistic look and feel to the show. It looks gritty with a dark palette and a somber military vibe. I really like shows that go in this direction. By that I mean in the direction of realism. I need to believe in the rules or the system of the game before I can suspend my disbelief and get into the story. The story of Universe seems to be built on a scaffold of concrete things. We have realistic sets and especially actors whose performances downplay the fantastic setting and story. People are attending to their business in a way that they would if all the science and sorcery was real. Real people in crazy environments and stories make for good television.
So deeper we go. Dr. Rush thought he had the secrets to opening the gate. A host of civilian types, including a senator, are along for the unveiling of the next channel to the far, far away. There’s a hitch though and it doesn’t work and I suppose this is the somewhat lame contrivance that brings Eli Wallace into frame. Dr. Rush and Eli get the thing working, during an alien attack that helps showcase the excellent effects in Universe. Now here’s the rub. Dr. Rush could have tuned in Earth as an escape route for those inside the base. He does not. Instead, he forces everyone to flee to the dark unknown beyond the 9th chevron, where Dr Rush seems to really, really want to go.
Through the Stargate they go, taking what they could hurriedly bring with them as the station behind them collapses along with the planet. They arrive on a seemingly crewless starship, later discovered to be called the Destiny, a ship on a very long voyage that has been underway for a very, very, long time. I like the look and feel of this setting. The ship is old, broke down and big. There are lots of places for adventure to be had and for secrets to hide. I wish they had gone for more spooky here though. It’s a missed opportunity. Everything is too well lit. People wander around on the Destiny like it’s the Love Boat. There should have been more inherent danger. Who knows what lurks around the next corner? Let’s hope they up the suspense in future episodes. I’m not a kid. I can take it. There is some medium tension created around the fact that the Destiny is kind of in disrepair. Without a fix, the castaways (hello Lost and again BattleStar) are toast within a reasonable sciencey period of time. To the rescue comes the Stargate itself, which though cannot get to Earth can still tune into parts really unknown. As we leave the crew of the Destiny, billions of light years from Earth, they are preparing to gate themselves to a desert world, chosen by the ship itself, to search for repair items to make the ship habitable for the long haul.
I really liked Stargate Universe. Sure, I nitpicked on a few details but I didn’t even want to get up to use the bathroom during the breaks. This is a good sign. We have really good actors and an awesome, claustrophobic setting that will hopefully lend itself to some mysterious and suspenseful moments. My advice to the creators of the show, Brad Wright and Robert C. Cooper, is to keep the show adult. Do not dumb the thing down for the larger audience. Make it scary, keep it smart and grounded in human emotion. The sexy part is ok, although the first glimpse of this was a little needy. Not everyone, or even anyone, in the cast is terribly likable. This is a good thing. Complex characters create complex responses to them. This is another good sign for the future to come. I’m excited about next week. On a more personal note, I had to watch the show in low def. The Space channel in Canada hasn’t switched to Hi yet. This is a terrible thing. I had to squint to make out some pixelated elements. I am spoiled, so sue me. Space!, get your act together.
Andy Mikita (director) / Brad Wright, Robert C. Cooper (screenplay)
CAST: Robert Carlyle … Dr. Nicholas Rush
Justin Louis … Everett Young
Brian J. Smith … Matthew Scott
Elyse Levesque … Chloe Armstrong
David Blue … Eli Wallace
Alaina Huffman … Tamara Johansen
Jamil Walker Smith … Ronald Greer
Patrick Gilmore … Dale Volker
Julia Anderson … Vanessa James
Peter Kelamis … Adam Brody
Jennifer Spence … Lisa Park
Jeffrey Bowyer-Chapman … Darren Becker
Ming-Na … Camile Wray
Josh Blacker … Sgt. Spencer
Lou Diamond Phillips … Colonel David Telford

Digg It
Stumble It
Tweet It
delicious
RSS




8 Comments
Nice review! Am I the only one though that absolutely despises Dr. Rush's long hair? He looks really annoying with it. I don't know if I can watch this show if he doesn't get a hair cut. Also, there is no attractive male lead in this show at all!! In Stargate Atlantis they had Ronon and Sheppard, and they were sexy. In Stargate Universe there isn't one pleasant looking guy, and this is supposed to be a sexed up show. WTF.
SGU review: 10 reasons Why Stargate universe sucks
SGU sucked so bad Gateworld is now screening critics and Syfy even turned off new account activation so I am now posting this all over the web.
1. Wrong name – should have called it “Lost Battlegate Atlantica's Anatomy Voyager”.
2. Confusing – Scrambled the sequence with unnecessary flashbacks and cause confusion, this only works if there is a big mystery, not the 15 minutes tiny mystery in SGU (Trying to copy Lost)
3. Lacks originality – Tried too hard to please everyone and ended up being a pile of nothing. As if the writers are beginners writing their first show, copying a little bit from every popular shows out there and calls it a day.
4. Trying too hard – Unnecessary sex scene which had nothing to do with anything else and screams “me-too”, to think we'll buy this crap just because you put it there is quiet insulting (Trying to copy Galatica)
5. Annoying – Way too much arguments, yes tension is needed between characters, but some idi0t decided it’d interesting for us to see people argue every step of the way (over common sense) from beginning to the end. Dude, just STFU and move on already.
6. Boring – Characters don't t stick, because they're all average clueless brain damaged amateurs and a loud mouth, everyone hates loud mouths.
7. Shaky cameras – Dude, stay the **** still.
8. Careless – With plot holes the size of Texas.
9. Too greedy – Crossed the fine line between bravery and stupidity, introducing new stuff to reach wider audience is understandable, ditching everything that was good and piss off loyal fans to the brand itself is just plain stupid.
10. Bad acting – Souless characters, cardboard acting, but what can you expect from a pilot with a lame script.
Obviously the guys running this project has the same mentality as the guys who renamed SciFi to Syfy (Syphilis) just to get paid.
Stargate Un[b]Y[/b]verse sucks.
If people want ice cream they get ice cream.
If people want steak they get steak.
Ice cream and steak don't mix.
SGU, Have fun shooting yourselves in the foot.
kind of agree… the acting was hollow… couldn't stand Rush : for me there was nothing to respect or like about him. half the cliche crying scene, and half the directionless expressions. when he tried to man up, and give the inspiring speech, i wanted to peel my face off and eat it. some of the other actors i think will be ok, eli, elyse weren't too bad. rest of the season : whole bundle of do i really care that much flashbacks, and the ship bricking itself – how do we fix this. still going to watch the next few. hopefully some of the actors settle down a bit.
Like the reviewer i'm a Stargate noob.I tried every previous attempt of the series and always lost my interest.I think this new approach to the Star Gate “Universe” is finaly getting interesting.
The only thing i read is a bunch of old Stargate fans who never like a change in the first place.(reminds me of the Star Trek fans who critisised the new movie)
I think it's unbelievable how you guys can talk about the quality of acting when you compare it to the old series?
Give the new approach some time to evolve….it's not perfect but it's going in the right direction.
@zornik and the unbelievable : that's it mate. with the old series, the acting reflected the premise, both were cheese – you knew it, the show knew it, so you accepted it. that fair?
Some of my thoughts on this “Melrose Place Command”..aaa, oops, “Stargate Universe” show (damn, how did I misspelled that?).
1. Stargate has nothing, but absolutely nothing to do with teenagers. Trying to feed us some 20-year old kids is stupid and pointless, nobody will like them, they don't and will never fit;
2. I think people would be a little less annoyed by this new cast if the writers would've find a way to SLOWLY bring them into the show. Like they did with the Atlantis people (and I got to like them at some point) – a few episodes with both new and original Stargate characters. Showing us O'Neill, Carter and Daniel for 50 seconds and stuffing 20 completely new people down our throats is NOT the way to go;
3. Too many questions raised after this pilot. Why were the Hataks so different? How did they started working and how did they managed to get the energy required for the 9th symbol? What about the ship? How can u open a wormhole on a MOVING ship, when they said, in the first SG-1 episodes, that you need to compensate for the planetary movement & stuff? Whatever…
4. I do know that people are getting old and things change. As much as I (and probably everyone else) would love to have O'Neill in Stargate forever, that's impossible. However, why not keep AT LEAST one key character in the show, to smooth things along? Ok, not for the entire show, but at least for 10 episodes or so. Get Daniel in there, or even McKay, and save this doomed SU…
5. Way too dark. Not the lightning (although some more lamps here and there couldn't hurt…but I guess it had to do with the energy of the ship being low. :)) ), but the feeling. Yeah, I know, I've seen many haters saying that SG-1 and SA were too optimistic, and the “good guys” always won. But I have to wonder…is that wrong? I really don't think so. Because, yes, you know right before watching a new episode that they will win in the end, but you STILL watch it while biting your nails every minute and STILL get the warm, fuzzy feeling in the end when they do win. It's like this: everyone knows Batman is gonna kick the bad guy's asses, but you still flood the cinemas when a new movie comes up. Stargate was always about hope, about the triumph of good vs. evil. Keep the damn feeling, you never lost any fans because of this. X(
I think there are more things to be said about SU, but I really think it's pointless. My conclusion? I give it one season, that's it. Then the Stargate franchise will be dead and buried (thanks guys). Too many changes, too fast, too sudden, too many strange new people, no known face. That's what makes SU a crappy show right from the start.
And to get the things even worse, the two new movies that we are all expecting (the Atlantis movie and the third SG-1 movie) are now on hold. Why? Because (get this), the “DVD market is going down”. Nice one, MGM. Keep having this attitude, you'll go down even faster than you DVD market.
I agree: Dr. Rush's long hair looks totally greasy, a fact which does not make him endearing. And in a televison series, an audience needs to be able to identify or at least empathesize somewhat with some of the characters. So far I'm just watching, somewhat bored.
And unlike the author of this blog, I don't find the grimness of the setting necessary to suspend disbelief. Dark isn't necessarily better; it just makes it difficult to see. (Then again, I wasn't a huge fan of “Galactica,” or even that futuristic cult favorite, “Blade Runner”.)
I just registered to say I just watched the last episode, called “Earth” and…
Okay, first episode I made an effort to watch the premier, since then I’ve been recording the series and watching it a day or two later.
After watching this episode, I will no longer even be recording it. Oh and by the way, I searched google for “stargate universe sucks” this is the first result. So true.