The Fourth Kind (2009) Movie Review

Featured, Sci-Fi Movie News, Sci-Fi Reviews, The Fourth Kind (2009) Movie — By Joseph Savitski on November 9, 2009

It’s been written that cannibals refuse to eat divorced women because they are too bitter. They’d be wise to adopt the same attitude towards anyone who sat through “The Fourth Kind”, it’s hard to feel anything else when exiting this failed experiment in scifi cinema verite. What makes the film such a catastrophic failure is that is has so much potential, that writer/director Olantunde Osunsami never seems capable of coming close to fulfilling. “The Fourth Kind” could have been an amazing faux documentary on alien home invasions in the remotest part of America, but instead all we’re offered is a rather boring film that’s occasionally spiked with something mildly interesting.

If you’re inclined to believe the film, there were things more disturbing than Sarah Palin’s moose hunting going on in Alaska during the final months of 2000. Specifically in the city of Nome, where psychiatrist Dr. Abbey Tyler starts getting results she hadn’t bargained for from her hypnotherapy sessions. She’s been treating patients for sleep problems, but some bizarre correlations arise when different patients describe being watched by an owl–one that stays the entire night, can’t be chased away, and somehow always finds a way inside. Probing deeper, she discovers there is no owl; the frightening reality is her patients are being taken from their homes by creatures from another world who can do with them whatever they want, whenever they want to do it. Still grieving from the recent death of her husband, Dr. Tyler has to deal with an increasingly hostile sheriff who suspects her in the recent deaths of patients, as well as the growing reality that her husband’s death was caused by extraterrestrials trying to erase their tracks.

There’s really no way to sugarcoat the fact that “The Fourth Kind” is a terrible movie. It’s not so much that the film’s chemistry is off, rather the test tubes are boiling over and the whole place has gone toxic in record time. Osunsanmi’s direction is listless and dull; he never evokes even remotely any feelings of suspense or tension in any of the scenes. A hostage scene where a husband is holding a gun to the heads of his wife and children plays out in an underwhelming fashion, as if Osunsanmi decided to drain all the adrenaline out of the scene just in case he’d need it later.

The hypnotherapy sessions also are devoid of any tension, they’re allowed to play out predictably with any shocks telegraphed at least a minute or two in advance. Granted, he tries some cinematic parlor tricks to try to liven things up, but they wear out their welcome quickly as their lack of appeal gives way to a realization of how pointless they are. Why disguise the patient’s identity onscreen, but allow us to hear his voice and see his face? Why bother to show the “tapes” of Dr. Tyler’s sessions alongside the film’s “re-enactment”, when they show pretty much the same thing? Osunsanmi’s overkill doesn’t end there; in the aforementioned hostage scene, we’re treated up to four screens showing the scene from various angles. None of which really show anything, and when shots are fired the scene is digitally blurred to obscure any violence. Scenes where Osunsanmi supposedly interviews the real “Dr. Tyler” at a fictional university are also fairly repetitive and don’t really accomplish anything but pad the running time and drag the film out, which is the only thing he does incredibly well.

Despite all that, “The Fourth Kind” could have been rescued by a really great script. Considering the premise, all it would’ve taken was a little imagination and a halfway decent writer. Since Osunsanmi writes worse than he directs, you’d have a better chance of drinking Tang with ET while watching “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” than getting a somewhat watchable movie. Setting an alien abduction film in a place like Nome, Alaska opens up a great chance to explore humanity’s fears of isolation, not to mention the despair of being at the mercy of beings who can do to us at their whim. Creatures coming for us when we sleep is a universal childhood fear, and discovering the monsters our parents told us are not only very real, but coming from God could only guess where has the makings of a nail biter. Presenting it as a sort of “Blair Witch Project” meets Whitney Streiber book also has a ton of exciting potential. Apparently those ideas were whisked away by the mothership to a better place, because all that’s left is a paint-by-numbers efforts that borders on the ridiculous.

Expecting us to swallow the idea that aliens can master intergalactic travel but haven’t figured out the language they’re using to communicate with us is older than the pyramids, and thus a bit out of date, is absurd. Trying to pass off the idea that extraterrestrials would behave like mobsters, killing Tyler’s husband and crippling her patient in order to silence her is just too stupid for words. Even dumber is having the aliens abduct her as a warning–if she’s such a threat why bother returning her? If the aliens’ behavior is anything to go by, we can infer there is life in outer space and they all ride the short bus.

The cast all turn in excellent performances, more in a testament to their abilities than the material they’re given. But effective acting simply isn’t enough to save this lost cause, and Milla Jovovich, Elias Koteas and Will Patton all deserve much better.

This weekend, the true humbug in theaters wasn’t “A Christmas Carol” after all, but a movie desperatly trying to ride the coattails of “Paranormal Activity”. Ironically, it’s been revealed that “The Fourth Kind” was shot in Bulgaria, with some parts filmed in California. Nor is there any Dr. Abbey Tyler and there has been no research published by her. Maybe if it was filmed as a straight science fiction film, this could have been a fairly interesting movie. But it wasn’t, so all we’re given is a sham–and a dull one at that.

Olatunde Osunsanmi (director) / Olatunde Osunsanmi, Terry Robbins (screenplay)
CAST: Milla Jovovich … Abbey Tyler
Will Patton … Sheriff August
Hakeem Kae-Kazim … Awolowa Odusami
Corey Johnson … Tommy Fisher
Enzo Cilenti … Scott Stracinsky
Elias Koteas … Abel Campos
Eric Loren … Deputy Ryan
Mia McKenna-Bruce … Ashley Tyler
Raphaël Coleman … Ronnie Tyler


Buy The Fourth Kind on DVD


    9 Comments

  • Rev. Timothy M Welchel says:

    ummm…apparently the writer of this review/commentary is completely unaware of the Biblical connections to this subject matter & thus sounds like a high school student trying to critique a doctoral master thesis on the basis of proper screenplay technique.

    you should stick to the fact that it’s difficult to find the evidence to support the supposed events of this movie, & not the fact that aliens should be speaking modern languages by now.

    “paranormal activity”…now there’s a film that any common movie goer could tear apart on the basis of mocumentary bogus details & missing nonsensical facts. because no empirical info is introduced to support the legitimacy of the story. however, if you look deeper into the Sumerian connection to the origin of linear & dimensional language development & origins, & how that particular language is a bridge to understanding the topics of Demonology & Pre-Flood (Biblical deluge or Noah’s Flood) speech & culture & events, then you might have a bone to pick with that particular aspect of this movie’s script. but as someone who has looked into this subject matter, i can tell you that that portion of the story was dead-on-the-money my friend! perhaps the only part of the story that can support the script with no trace of ambiguity…& perhaps the best “cookie” they had for offering any legitimacy the the subject of “alien abductions” having a link to Demonology & “The Watchers” (Coptic version of The Book of Enoch) or “Nephilim” (Chpt.6 from The Book of Genesis – Tanakh/Old Testament) link to the Extraterrestrial phenomena.

    aside from that, you seem to be expecting the perpetual “cookie-cutter” manifestation of a Hollywood film, with no room for experimentation of a fresh new way of approaching the film making process. aside from being a Reverend, i am also a film maker & special effects artist. (just FYI)

    sincerely, Rev. TMW

  • Joseph Peter Savitski says:

    You’ve lost me there, I’m suppose to like a terrible film because it regurgitates a lot of old research done by someone else? The evidence you mentioned isn’t new, it’s been in books, movies, and documentaries for a long time. Why the hell should I stick to the fact it’s hard to find evidence about extraterrestrials??? FYI–everyone knows that, otherwise, well we would’ve had it already.

    The wrote a review on a film, a fictional story that was said to be based on true events. It was a terrible film. It was not “fresh” or “experimental”, it was done in a genre that’s been around for quite a while. My review never faulted the facts they presented, just how the film was made. I do find it odd in which you say you’re a filmmaker and special effects artist but you never mention once what part of the actual moviemaking part of the film you liked, you just gave me a rather bizarre history lession. If anything, your post is like an Amish man trying to sell satellite tv.

    • Rev. Timothy M Welchel says:

      personally, i liked the entire film…from beginning to end. i even saw it again the very next night with my 3 roommates & they all agreed that it was a very intense, captivating & SPOOKY film (even if it is “possibly” completely fiction ~ which is yet 2 B determined, FYI) U really should B careful of exclaiming something 2 B a hoax B 4 U have emirical evidence 2 support Ur accusations – & no, a lack of evidence is not ALWAYS proof that someone has made a sucker of us…

      i don’t say this 2 speak down @ U, but merely 2 provoke thought outside the box. mayB U didn’t quite comprehed the underlying story enough 2 grasp what was really going on in this movie. as for the movie making, writing & directing techinques of the film – well, all i can say is that has 2 B chalked up as artistic opinioin. one man’s junk is another’s treasure…Star Wars has a HUGE following, but i think it is a peice of intergalactic, gelatinous crap (4 example)…

      U might find my response 2 [ ds ]–(below this reply) intersting. it might give a nutshell explaination of some of what i mean by the underlying story that U may not B comprehending/grasping in the story (U consider 2 B dull & drawn out without originality), that made it so very CREEPY/SPOOKY N mine, my girlfriend, & roommates opinions.

      however, thanx 4 taking the time 2 even write Ur opinion/review of this movie N the 1st place bro. & U certainly have the right 2 Ur personal opinion of thinking the movie was worthless. i’m sure many people loved “Paranormal Activity”, but i almost demanded my money back…LOL!

      PS ~ the “Omish man trying 2 sell TVs” crack was very funny…it made me laugh! thanx for keeping it real my fellow critic…B’nigh Shalom!

  • ds says:

    sure, an alien race that is so far advanced to the point of star trek beaming children out with a beam of light, and they can only communicate with dead lang that is 1000’s of years before christ, and the voice says “I am god”

    I also see a lot of people trying to find this abby tyler, did you guys not hear the firm in the beginning saying that names would be changed to protect peoples identies? If this is even a remotely true story, then this name
    Abby Taylor would be a fake name…

    If you have any doubt of this fake movie being true, read
    my first paragraph…

    When they said it was a true story…I think it was true to the point
    that the person telling the story thought it was true or they were told
    by people saying that it was true..based off true events means some of this tape babble may have actually happened.

    but when I hear some tape playing back what sounds like an alien
    talking in a language that was the first language, and states
    I am god…

    when you think about it, it sounds more like satans work, and
    as you get more into the movie about all these people, it looks
    like demonic possession, not the work of aliens…

    someone, somewhere, maybe have seen or gone through something,
    I do not think it had anything to do with UFO’s – I would beleive
    that it had something to do with satan more then I would UFO or aliens.

    • Rev. Timothy M Welchel says:

      AMEN & AMEN brother!!! that’s exactly what U were seeing N this film; which i don’t think most people clued N 2, due 2 their lack of Biblical or Demonology understanding/education.

      B4 i devoted my life 2 Jesus Christ as my Savior & GOD, i was a Necronomicist (ancient Sumerian wizardry – practiced by the witch of Endor who summonded the Prophet Nathan @ the request of King Saul, N the Old Testament). this is the ancient Sumarian worship of the “Watchers” who were the fathers of the Nephilim (Angelic [or non-human] & human hybrids ~ see Genesis 6). & this movie “The Fourth Kind” is an excelent portrayal of how The Watchers (or fallen angels – demons) R trying 2 reincert themselves back N2 public society N these last days, B4 the return of Christ (Satan needs an army of hybrids or superhumans 2 wage war against GOD when He returns 2 rule over Earth for 1000 years).

      if U know anything about what/who the Nephilim R, then U’ll know that they were blasmphemous/destructive enough 2 the face of the Earth & mankind that Y’haveh (GOD) decided 2 flood the entire planet N order 2 wipe them off the face of the planet. why do U think that better than 96% of “alien abduction” accounts involve experimentatioin/probing of the human reproductive systems?

  • Natallia says:

    Pattymelt, your excellent movie review was the very first thing I read this morning. My cat babies were gathered around me as I chuckled and giggled and almost nearly cried, and I do believe they also appreciated the review mightily.

  • Sasha says:

    You’re a sellout and a closeminded bitch

  • Doug C. says:

    I don’t know what was creepier – reading the review or the comments left by a supposed man of God.

    • Rev. Timothy M Welchel says:

      qualifying Ur statement “supposed man of God” would certainly be a step N the right direction of building any credibility on Ur part, sir Douglas C.

      unless of course Ur intent was simply meant to disqualify me with such an empty, ambiguous insult.

      my comments on this subject content were intended 2 B creepy, because it’s a creepy reality when U understand the bigger picture.

      no offense taken though. just curious Y U felt the need 2 usurp my position simply for the sake of making Ur point…which i’m yet 2 C.

      B’nigh & Shabbat Shalom, M Messiah Y’shua!
      Rev. †imº†hy M. Welchel

Leave a Reply