pretty sad to see all this negativism and none have even seen the remake.

I can say that this story has been played before, countless times through our history. How many wars and conflicts in history have been intervened by a third party? The ’51 movie was a modern extension to what has happened in our past histories. China is an excellent example of a country brought together partially in this manner in its early formation. Cease and desist your conflict, it is interfering with our trade. Failure will bring our might upon you.

How many Shakespearean tales have been remade? Allen Poe? Most Sci-fi series, especially the Trek ones, have covered such stories and then some, ad nauseum. There are many stories I have noticed being blended into every sci-fi out there, the idea taken from another series and adapted to fit the new series. How many times must HG Wells stories be made over for crying out loud?

Some sucked. I’ll grant you that. But some also shined, simply because the writers made the story fit well to the current social mood of the time.

This isn’t any different with the remake of “The Day”. I can guarantee you that someone will remake Godzilla, and King Kong.

And on that note, some remakes like Battlestar Galactica are incredibly well written, acted and presented. I grew up with the original and liked it, but I like the modern remake that much more.

Don’t cut it until you try it. Opinions of others is irrelevant until the cake is done.

Global warming is a sincere threat to all life on this planet. But, since when did violence stop being a threat? Is war now passe? War and violence of all types are about conflicting egos. Have we grown up and become humble since 1951? Improved special effects won’t improve a weak message. The original message was the right one; it still is. We need that message repeated now more than ever. Violence and war must end if we are to survive. There must be security for all or no one is secure. Besides, the original effects were pretty good.

Most of you people are naive sheep. The earth has actually cooled for the past 8 years, and new data strongly correlates climactic changes to solar patterns. Quit drinking your liberal Algore kool-aid. The earth has been around for billions of years, while industrialized civilization has been around for a couple hundred. You seriously think we are changing the climate? Ha ha ha.

FACTS AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING: DEALING IN SPECULATION?
An excerpt from Is Man Caused Global Warming a Scientific Fact? offers up one dissenter’s ideas regarding the facts against global warming.

“.The key to separating scientific knowledge from belief is that science can be demonstrated. We may never have good enough error bands on the data about global temperature data; thus it is something that is just not knowable. Opinions on things unknowable are called beliefs. Because of the inapplicability of the scientific method when dealing with open systems, opinions on global warming are beliefs akin to a sort of religious view and not scientific fact.

.I failed to see even an estimate of the amount of error of natural emissions of CO2 in the documentation from the EPA. The science I know of means you figure the answer and then you do the hard part of calculating the minimum, maximum, and probable errors. It is not possible in this case to even have hard numbers on CO2 venting – thus we are again not looking at science, but only estimates and speculation. Attaching numbers to speculation does not elevate it to science.

.The much hyped report from the EPA was made by people who’s income depends on the continued belief of a CO2 caused warming trend.”
FACTS AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING: QUESTIONING THE IMPACT OF PEOPLE
A few interesting facts against global warming are brought up in an article called Global Warming is a Hoax:

“Global warming is a hoax, invented in 1988, that combines old myths including limits to growth, sustainability, the population growth time bomb, the depletion of resources, pollution, anti-Americanism and anti-corporate sentiment and, of all things, fear of an ice age. Those that espoused and supported the old myths have joined forces into a new group called ‘Environmentalists.’

Most environmentalists have no technical or scientific credentials whatsoever. What they have are major news outlets ready and willing to publicize their every utterance regardless of whether or not they are backed up by scientific proof. Atmospheric science requires highly technical knowledge and skills, not possessed by the vast majority of the so-called environmentalists, who yet feel qualified to demand that human activity subjugate itself to the whims of their new deity, Mother Nature.

Environmentalists claim that the Earth’s atmosphere is getting hotter. They claim that the polar icecaps and glaciers will melt and sea levels will rise over two hundred feet, flooding most coastal cities. They claim that many areas of the Earth will turn into deserts. They make all these claims but cannot substantiate them with real scientific evidence.

Parts of the polar icecap and glaciers are melting but other areas of the polar icecaps and glaciers are thickening. The environmentalists base their “proof” of the existence of global warming on the melting areas but are strangely silent, even militant to the point of violence, if anyone mentions the areas that are thickening, and those thickening areas are many.

In the past, there have been many times when the global mean temperatures were warmer, sometimes much warmer and colder, much colder than they are now. Global mean temperatures are cyclical with the seasons but also with other normal cycles, as they have been for the entire history of the Earth. Scientific data from ice cores, tree rings and other indicators of global mean temperatures prove this.

Human activity has never been the cause of these global temperature swings as the “global warming” advocates claim. If human activity was the cause, where were the SUVs, the power plants and industries in our historical past? They did not exist. If human activity was not the cause of these global temperature swings, what was?”
Interesting facts against global warming indeed.
FACTS AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING: THE CABAL STEALS U.S. WEALTH
Another fascinating article regarding some facts against global warming is called There is no Global Warming, which discusses the Kyoto Protocol fraud:

“.only developed industrial nations will be bound by the treaty. Undeveloped Third-World nations will be free to produce whatever they want. the treaty is really about redistribution of the wealth. The wealth of the United States is and has always been the target. The new scheme to grab the loot is through environmental scare tactics.

If, today, you were to attend a UN session on the Climate Change Protocol you would find yourself in a discussion with excited delegates from Third-World countries. They would make comments to you like, ‘when the technology transfer takes place my country will begin producing this or that item.’

Translation – when the United States is stupid enough to fall for this scheme, the Third World will take up the slack and get rich. And international corporations, who owe allegiance to no nation, will bolt America and move their factories, lock, stock and computer chip, to those Third-World countries where they will be free to carry on production.

But that means the same emissions will be coming out of the jungles of South America instead of Chicago.

So where is the protection of the environment? You see it’s not about that – is it?

Still not convinced? One more thing. Hidden in the small print of the treaty is a provision that calls for the ‘harmonizing of patent laws’. Now, robbing a nation of its patent protection is an interesting tactic for protecting the environment, don’t you think?”
Now we’re dealing with some facts against global warming that touches on the true subject contributing to the world’s current problems: The criminal banking and industrial cabal.

This cabal that owns and controls the multinationals sees all that fertile Third World territory for more profit. Along the way, it can decimate America and all those “freedom-loving” and “free thinking” people who pose a threat to the cabal’s intent on ultimate One World Government control.

FACTS AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING: THE BANKING LINK
We could go on and on listing more facts against global warming. The point is that the same elite ruining us through items such as the Kyoto Protocol is the one ruining us through the main problem: the banking scam.

Allowing these international bankers and industrialists to control our monetary system is at the very heart of current world problems. Our money and banking is the key to the New World Order. More education on this is available at Federal Reserve banking history and Money Creation.

Once you understand that the elite cabal funds its Global Community programs, such as hiding facts against global warming, through illegal taxation and fraudulent debt creation, you can begin to see that one solution is to go after that funding.

By blindly buying into federal taxes and a mountain of debt, Americans are unwittingly funding the elite and their totalitarian plans.

It doesn’t have to be this way. If the people are educated on the fraud, the fraud falls apart, and these bad effects of Globalization can be stopped.

We suggest you allow Aaron Russo to educate you on the fraudulent tax issue and take advantage of our debt elimination program.

FACTS AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING: OUR SOLUTION TO TYRANNY
We’ve discovered the debt solution by becoming experts on legally eliminating your debt. This process will free you financially while reducing the amount of money available to the banking cabal. We must cut the cabal’s funding and for every dollar of debt you legally eliminate through us, you’re cutting $33 out of their pockets because of their fractional reserve banking scam.

You’ve learned a few facts against global warming. Now it’s time to join us and take the positive step toward removing the funding the elite cabal is using to enslave us. Talking isn’t enough anymore. Keeping your money out of the banksters’ coffers is real, positive action.

Join our Debt Relief Education Program today. Just fill in your information below to see if you qualify:

from the extensive knowlege I have on radio and electromagnetic physics, much of what the cause for the problem is blamed on us is hogwash to me. The fellow with the long diatribe before me covers a lot of flotsam against that idea, some of it valid. As it is right now, market corrections are invalidating some points.

I prefer to look at causality from the macro point of view, that is, what stellar influences have upon our atmosphere. I know how the sun affects our ionosphere for radio transmission. I also know that the influence of that sun causes convection currents in our atmosphere, much like it does in our oceans. I know this same influence is reflected from the moon, as well as tidal influences that further mix things up, not only in the oceans, but the tectonic plates as well. I know our atmosphere is bombarded with all sorts of radiation from outer space, some of it remnants of ancient supernovae and the like. This energy influences our magnetosphere in significant ways, much like the sun does. I know this comes in a cyclical manner as our planet rotates on axis and orbit about the sun. I know that other planetary bodies in our solar system can also influence this. Add to that the solar spot cycles, all at varying times from 11 hour cycles to 11 day cycles on up to 11 year cycles, which all conjunct at regular intervals to show peak events, which also conjunct with the intervals of the moon and other planets in our solar system. Cosmic radiation mixes up the pot to make it all interesting.

What am I saying here? Simply that global warming is cyclical in nature, it has been much much warmer in the past, and much much colder as well…and the intervals for each are many and varied. The ice we have today is not the same ice that was around 65 million years ago. Come to think of it, even 10 million if memory serves me right. What happened in the past with regard to climate change will continue to follow that cycle, and the efforts we make are well…futile. These past 3 winters locally have been progressively colder and more snow than the previous 10, of which were well within normal for this area. News tells me it is pretty cold north of 60.

Besides, 25 years ago, the hype was all about global cooling. Who to believe?

And lets not forget this one simple fact. Meteorologists can barely predict several weeks in advance, aside from following trend models. How are we to know right now how warm or cold it will be in 50 years? We don’t. It is all guess work on theoretical model constructs, many of which do not contain EVERY variable influence, like the ones I mentioned above, along with all that other data and then some.

The unfortunate thing about global warming, is that way too many sciences can be used to make an argument about one or another point, but not all of them converge to give any solid conclusion. Speculation isn’t good enough for me. Chicken little is not how one would describe me on the subject, nor would I support lunacy in the fruitless persuit of reductions to that inalienable foe called man made co2.

And yes, I am sick of my energy costs going up because of chicken littles in our society.