The Day the Earth Stood Still Remake is About Global Warming

Sci-Fi Movie News, The Day the Earth Stood Still (Remake 2008) Movie — By Nix on March 21, 2008

You knew it had to happen, and in the back of you mind, you even suspected. Yes, it’s true, the upcoming remake of “The Day the Earth Stood Still” will throw away the “end violence” message of the 1951 original, and instead exchange it with a “get green” message of today. I guess in a way I sort of knew this was going to happen. It’s Hollywood, after all, and “going green” is the cause du jour of the last few years. They’ll keep pumping the same message until something more sexy comes along.

More:

Fifty years later and Klaatu has a new message for humanity, but one with equally dire consequences should we choose to ignore it, Keanu Reeves, who is playing the alien in Scott Derrickson’s upcoming remake, told MTV News.

“The first one was borne out of the cold war and nuclear détente. Klaatu came and was saying cease and desist with your violence. If you can’t do it yourselves we’re going to do it. That was the film of that day,” Reeves explained. “The version I was just working on, instead of being man against man, it’s more about man against nature. My Klaatu says that if the Earth dies, you die. If you die, the earth survives. I’m a friend to the earth.”

While humanity still engages in a staggering number of international conflicts, the environmental message is one that, not only encompasses wars, and fights, and terrorism, but one that goes beyond constrictions to become a millennial message of “what we are doing and who we are as a species,” Reeves insisted. “We’re trying to reach beyond the idea of [just] environmentalism.”

What’s next, change Gort to a cuddly CGI Amazon Rain Forest monkey?

The Day the Earth Stood Still Remake is About Global Warming


    25 Comments

  • Ikin says:

    The Day the Earth Stood Still is one of those movies you just can’t make a remake. While an end to violence is a message that stands the test of time, global warming is just a “fad” cause.

    Another thing…. this version will probably be loaded with unnecessary violence and action. Which would suck.

    • Linda says:

      I think you are right about the violence and the action. And probably they will change the compassionate trust building and lovely subtle hint of attraction in the original between Klaatu and Helen into a gratuitous role-in-the-hay in the remake.

  • Can anyone say, “Battlefield: Earth?” I completely agree that not only can this NOT be remade, but it shouldn’t be remade. It’s like revisiting 2001: a Space Odyssey or Alien. It’s just oozing failure.

  • Linda says:

    Sigh, I will probably go to see this movie. The original movie is part of the culture of my childhood – it scared me, inspired me, and I imprinted on it. Michael Rennie’s demeanor reminds me of my grandfather who emigrated from Britain to America in 1913. My grandfather was a tall, gaunt man whose voice I can still hear. And Michael Rennie’s voice – dignified with a touch of humor, still haunts me. They are both long gone now, and I miss them both. The remake of this movie is riding on the coattails of a classic because I think there are many people like me who will go to see it out of love for the original film even though we suspect that we will be hugely disappointed.

  • Tripp Van Easille says:

    I completely agree with the “Battlefield Earth” parallel. Check out this summer’s “Global Warming” ‘thriller’, “The Happening”….need I say more? Send this clunker straigh-to-video and save your selves from the viscious reviews. A huge waste of money!

  • Bernie says:

    A remake? I am just as appalled as most fans of the original film. Revisiting the same general plot but with the eco twist is a clear demonstration of the poor imagination which seems to be repeatedly revealed in the continuous run of remakes coming out of the Hollywood dream factory.

    I must admit to always being intrigued by the end of the original film. Even with the stark warning that Earth would be reduced to a burnt out cinder it would be unlikely to result in all the conflicts ending.

    So what happened next? What would have happened when Gort returned to find that the Earth was still following its old ways? Now surely that chapter would require a bit more imagination? Could the scriptwriters and director produce a story which was as thoughtful as the original and did NOT resort to cheap battle scenes. If the Earth was made to “stand still” again would a repeat performance work?

    If only Klaatu could have been here when the studio was re-shooting the film….he could have cut their electricity supply.

  • M says:

    The best thing that was close to a remake was Starman, which was about people, and humanity, not about trees. If your going to to be vulgar and re-make anything you must adhere to the original message and re-amplify it in a new and unique way, otherwise do not wast your time. Do re-write history, even though it it science fiction.

  • Sid says:

    I agree…DON’T MESS WITH PERFECTION!! What next, a “reimagining” of Citizen Kane with Brad Pitt!?

  • Dann says:

    Perhaps Al Gore should have been the Robot?

  • John says:

    If you buy the movie,there is a story inside explaining meanings and special effects. It’s a short, yet interesting read.

  • John says:

    I watched the trailor. This looks like it will be a good movie, but should be viewed with no comparison to the original.

Leave a Reply