Comments on: Star Trek (2009) Movie Review http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/ No Anal Probing Involved Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:24:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Cookie M http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/comment-page-2/#comment-6788 Cookie M Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:48:28 +0000 http://www.scificool.com/?p=6014#comment-6788 Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet should<br>be compared to the "military" and the crew, to soldiers. That would be<br>perhaps true of the "dog faces" and non command personal.<br>But Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,... were Academy graduates.<br>You don't get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don't <br>graduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.<br>Kirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.<br><br>As far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea because<br>of cursing and I also don't think that children should have to see<br>Kirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so <br>"anything goes" liberal minded (and greedy) that they would say<br>take your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the <br>average American household. Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet should
be compared to the “military” and the crew, to soldiers. That would be
perhaps true of the “dog faces” and non command personal.
But Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,… were Academy graduates.
You don't get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don't
graduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.
Kirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.

As far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea because
of cursing and I also don't think that children should have to see
Kirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so
“anything goes” liberal minded (and greedy) that they would say
take your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the
average American household.

]]> By: Cookie M http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-11139 Cookie M Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:48:00 +0000 http://www.scificool.com/?p=6014#comment-11139 Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the "military" and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the "dog faces" and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,... were Academy graduates.rnYou don't get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don't rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don't think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn"anything goes" liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household. Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the “military” and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the “dog faces” and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,… were Academy graduates.rnYou don’t get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don’t rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don’t think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn”anything goes” liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household.

]]> By: Cookie M http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-11967 Cookie M Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:48:00 +0000 http://www.scificool.com/?p=6014#comment-11967 Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the "military" and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the "dog faces" and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,... were Academy graduates.rnYou don't get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don't rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don't think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn"anything goes" liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household. Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the “military” and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the “dog faces” and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,… were Academy graduates.rnYou don’t get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don’t rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don’t think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn”anything goes” liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household.

]]> By: Cookie M http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-24180 Cookie M Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:48:00 +0000 http://www.scificool.com/?p=6014#comment-24180 Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the "military" and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the "dog faces" and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,... were Academy graduates.rnYou don't get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don't rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don't think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn"anything goes" liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household. Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the “military” and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the “dog faces” and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,… were Academy graduates.rnYou don’t get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don’t rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don’t think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn”anything goes” liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household.

]]> By: Cookie M http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-36236 Cookie M Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:48:00 +0000 http://www.scificool.com/?p=6014#comment-36236 Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the "military" and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the "dog faces" and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,... were Academy graduates.rnYou don't get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don't rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don't think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn"anything goes" liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household. Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the “military” and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the “dog faces” and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,… were Academy graduates.rnYou don’t get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don’t rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don’t think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn”anything goes” liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household.

]]> By: Cookie M http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40017 Cookie M Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:48:00 +0000 http://www.scificool.com/?p=6014#comment-40017 Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the "military" and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the "dog faces" and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,... were Academy graduates.rnYou don't get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don't rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don't think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn"anything goes" liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household. Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the “military” and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the “dog faces” and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,… were Academy graduates.rnYou don’t get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don’t rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don’t think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn”anything goes” liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household.

]]> By: Cookie M http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-44390 Cookie M Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:48:00 +0000 http://www.scificool.com/?p=6014#comment-44390 Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the "military" and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the "dog faces" and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,... were Academy graduates.rnYou don't get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don't rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don't think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn"anything goes" liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household. Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the “military” and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the “dog faces” and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,… were Academy graduates.rnYou don’t get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don’t rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don’t think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn”anything goes” liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household.

]]> By: Cookie M http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-49274 Cookie M Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:48:00 +0000 http://www.scificool.com/?p=6014#comment-49274 Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the "military" and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the "dog faces" and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,... were Academy graduates.rnYou don't get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don't rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don't think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn"anything goes" liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household. Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the “military” and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the “dog faces” and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,… were Academy graduates.rnYou don’t get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don’t rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don’t think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn”anything goes” liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household.

]]> By: Cookie M http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-56479 Cookie M Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:48:00 +0000 http://www.scificool.com/?p=6014#comment-56479 Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the "military" and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the "dog faces" and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,... were Academy graduates.rnYou don't get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don't rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don't think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn"anything goes" liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household. Several comments above someone mentioned that Star Fleet shouldrnbe compared to the “military” and the crew, to soldiers. That would bernperhaps true of the “dog faces” and non command personal.rnBut Kirk, Spock, Scott, Uhura, etc,… were Academy graduates.rnYou don’t get into the academy if your a schlep, and you don’t rngraduate with high honors if you are a punk. It takes discipline.rnKirk is a punk in this movie. No way could he be a Academy Grad.rnrnAs far as little kids seeing it, I think it would be a bad idea becausernof cursing and I also don’t think that children should have to seernKirk in a bed with a green woman. Of course Hollywood is so rn”anything goes” liberal minded (and greedy) that they would sayrntake your little kids. But Hollywood is really out of touch with the rnaverage American household.

]]> By: DJ Frankee Cee http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-6512 DJ Frankee Cee Fri, 12 Jun 2009 05:37:31 +0000 http://www.scificool.com/?p=6014#comment-6512 Lighten up my a$$. As far as taking kids to see it, nope. Can't do it. They can see everything else star trek, but this film is so mess-up kids can't see it. Unless your raising a juvinile deliquent, that you are hoping will someday curse you out for not giving him a beer and a joint like you did when he was 10. This movie was to pull in a new audience and that audience is teens who giggle and thrill at every foul profane comment made even if it makes no gramorical sense what so ever. "O boy he said $hit, this is a great movie!" This movie director when for the "cheap" version, with the cheap thrills. I just don't understand why they stuck the "STAR TREK" name on this piece of crap. Except for spock and the ship, nothing looks or feels like Star Trek. Lighten up my a$$. As far as taking kids to see it, nope.
Can’t do it. They can see everything else star trek, but
this film is so mess-up kids can’t see it. Unless your raising a
juvinile deliquent, that you are hoping will someday curse you out
for not giving him a beer and a joint like you did when he was 10.
This movie was to pull in a new audience and that audience is
teens who giggle and thrill at every foul profane comment
made even if it makes no gramorical sense what so ever.
“O boy he said $hit, this is a great movie!” This movie director
when for the “cheap” version, with the cheap thrills.
I just don’t understand why they stuck the “STAR TREK”
name on this piece of crap. Except for spock and the ship,
nothing looks or feels like Star Trek.

]]> By: DJ Frankee Cee http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-6511 DJ Frankee Cee Fri, 12 Jun 2009 05:21:34 +0000 http://www.scificool.com/?p=6014#comment-6511 I never go to church, fool. I can take a 7 year old to see a movie where someone talks about "sex with farm animals". But that would hav been a hefty shock if I had tried to bring my 7 year old and that occured. i like children forced into a sexual world. It's happenning at an all too younger and younger age. BUT I was able to show my 7 year old all the Star Trek Filmation cartoons and the previous movies and the TV show without any concern. But nooo not this director was dead set on appealing to a younger toilet mouth mind set crowd. My 7 year old want to see cool special effects and NOT LT Uhura undressing. Make up your mind as to who your audience is. Like with the Superman 2 movie Chris Reeves is shown sleeping with Lois Lane. This is a childs character from a kids comic book. Even Margo Kidder said she was against Superman having a sexy sleep-over with lois. Then in Superman Returns we have to be comfronted with superman having a bastard child! Why the hell to kids need that. It's a kid gendre. And as far as "not knowing what the military is" and "they are soldiers and in this movie, teenage and early twenty year old young adults" You don't get command of a multi-billion dollar Star Fleet Battle Cruiser unless you are ATLEAST 35 to 40 years old. Are there any sub commanders or Aircraft carrier commanders under the age of 40? You can bet your snot nose little a$$ there are not. Geez, some people would take their kids to see a porn movie and give them a joint to smoke. I never go to church, fool. I can take a 7 year old to see
a movie where someone talks about “sex with farm animals”.
But that would hav been a hefty shock if I had tried to
bring my 7 year old and that occured. i like children forced
into a sexual world. It’s happenning at an all too younger and younger age. BUT I was able to show my 7 year old all the Star Trek Filmation cartoons and the previous movies and the TV show
without any concern. But nooo not this director was dead set on
appealing to a younger toilet mouth mind set crowd.
My 7 year old want to see cool special effects and NOT LT
Uhura undressing. Make up your mind as to who your audience is.
Like with the Superman 2 movie Chris Reeves is shown sleeping with Lois Lane. This is a childs character from a kids comic book.
Even Margo Kidder said she was against Superman having a sexy sleep-over with lois. Then in Superman Returns we have to be comfronted with superman having a bastard child! Why the hell
to kids need that. It’s a kid gendre.

And as far as “not knowing what the military is” and “they are soldiers and in this movie, teenage and early twenty year old young adults” You don’t get command of a multi-billion dollar Star Fleet Battle Cruiser unless you are ATLEAST 35 to 40 years old.
Are there any sub commanders or Aircraft carrier commanders
under the age of 40? You can bet your snot nose little a$$ there are not. Geez, some people would take their kids to see a porn movie and give them a joint to smoke.

]]> By: trek fan http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-6450 trek fan Mon, 25 May 2009 01:59:17 +0000 http://www.scificool.com/?p=6014#comment-6450 well ive been a star trek fan for as long as ive been alive, im feeling mixed emotions about this movie as i love canon trek, and this kinda goes a little off the beaten path. also i do not care for the enterprise as i love and adore the refited enterprise. i feel the cast was pretty good, and the script was a rip off of the wrath of khan. as far as it being for foul mouthed teens that guy obviously goes to church every sunday and lives ina bubble. there was nothing too over the top and i dont think it ruins it for younger audience members. just be responsable parents and explain to your kids that the very very very few scenes with anything remotley vulgar should not be repeated. this star trek movie was created to be more real life. i dont know what he thinks the military is, but i can assure you that worse is said between soldiers, which is what star trek is about. members of starfleet are not dainty little prude people, they are soldiers and in this movie, teenage and early twenty year old young adults. well ive been a star trek fan for as long as ive been alive, im feeling mixed emotions about this movie as i love canon trek, and this kinda goes a little off the beaten path. also i do not care for the enterprise as i love and adore the refited enterprise. i feel the cast was pretty good, and the script was a rip off of the wrath of khan. as far as it being for foul mouthed teens that guy obviously goes to church every sunday and lives ina bubble. there was nothing too over the top and i dont think it ruins it for younger audience members. just be responsable parents and explain to your kids that the very very very few scenes with anything remotley vulgar should not be repeated. this star trek movie was created to be more real life. i dont know what he thinks the military is, but i can assure you that worse is said between soldiers, which is what star trek is about. members of starfleet are not dainty little prude people, they are soldiers and in this movie, teenage and early twenty year old young adults.

]]> By: madmax2 http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-6446 madmax2 Sun, 24 May 2009 16:26:37 +0000 http://www.scificool.com/?p=6014#comment-6446 Oh lighten up people... Oh lighten up people…

]]> By: JEFF J http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-6440 JEFF J Sat, 23 May 2009 02:05:06 +0000 http://www.scificool.com/?p=6014#comment-6440 I JUST SAW IT YESTERDAY AND SPEAKING AS A LONG-TIME STAR TREK FAN: Like most movies made recently, it was a special-effects extravaganza. Also like most movies made today, the plot seems like it was written for a comic book. Star Trek purists will be especially disappointed. The actors selected to portray the characters were OK, but the film suffered from an unbelievably moronic story line. I’ve seen better on television. Most of the episodes from the TV series played better, and I didn’t blow 10 bucks to see them. Gene Roddenberry probably rolled over in his grave. Let Rick Berman produce the next one. I JUST SAW IT YESTERDAY AND SPEAKING AS A LONG-TIME STAR TREK FAN:
Like most movies made recently, it was a special-effects extravaganza. Also like most movies made today, the plot seems like it was written for a comic book. Star Trek purists will be especially disappointed. The actors selected to portray the characters were OK, but the film suffered from an unbelievably moronic story line. I’ve seen better on television. Most of the episodes from the TV series played better, and I didn’t blow 10 bucks to see them. Gene Roddenberry probably rolled over in his grave. Let Rick Berman produce the next one.

]]> By: JB http://www.scificool.com/star-trek-2009-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-6431 JB Thu, 21 May 2009 17:14:47 +0000 http://www.scificool.com/?p=6014#comment-6431 summary of the movie: VROOM SCREECH ZZAP ARGH THUDD SCRASH film ending: BOOOOM so faithful to the original that vulcans even have pointed ears don't miss Eric Bana's killer look, even nastier than Mickey Mouse's take a load of the cool young Spock, driving his galactic egg-whisk see Leonard Nimoy gone senile, which accounts for why did he take part in all this dig the black hole: not the one on screen, I mean the script of this Charlie's Angel's-like flick 40 years ago the show was cancelled and then it resurrected: this movie surely potholes the myth, but then.. who knows? PS: Gene Roddenberry's son must've been brainwashed, since on roddenberry.com he declares his father would've been enthusiast of this movie because "it respects the true philosophy of Star Trek": WHAT?? 8-| summary of the movie: VROOM SCREECH ZZAP ARGH THUDD SCRASH

film ending: BOOOOM

so faithful to the original that vulcans even have pointed ears

don’t miss Eric Bana’s killer look, even nastier than Mickey Mouse’s

take a load of the cool young Spock, driving his galactic egg-whisk

see Leonard Nimoy gone senile, which accounts for why did he take part in all this

dig the black hole: not the one on screen, I mean the script of this Charlie’s Angel’s-like flick

40 years ago the show was cancelled and then it resurrected: this movie surely potholes the myth, but then.. who knows?

PS: Gene Roddenberry’s son must’ve been brainwashed, since on roddenberry.com he declares his father would’ve been enthusiast of this movie because “it respects the true philosophy of Star Trek”: WHAT?? 8-|

]]>