<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Blade Runner Script Draft Surfaces</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scificool.com/new-blade-runner-script-draft-surfaces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scificool.com/new-blade-runner-script-draft-surfaces/</link>
	<description>The Latest Science Fiction Movie, TV, and Comic Book news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:34:08 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the cat who walks through walls</title>
		<link>http://www.scificool.com/new-blade-runner-script-draft-surfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-6494</link>
		<dc:creator>the cat who walks through walls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 05:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scificool.com/?p=4547#comment-6494</guid>
		<description>Sheesh, the December 22, 1980 draft has been circulating for at least ten years (which is about when I picked it up).  I&#039;ve got another draft, dated July 24, 1980, as well.

 I can&#039;t believe this is news!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheesh, the December 22, 1980 draft has been circulating for at least ten years (which is about when I picked it up).  I&#8217;ve got another draft, dated July 24, 1980, as well.</p>
<p> I can&#8217;t believe this is news!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waaaah he is not a replicant</title>
		<link>http://www.scificool.com/new-blade-runner-script-draft-surfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-6237</link>
		<dc:creator>Waaaah he is not a replicant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scificool.com/?p=4547#comment-6237</guid>
		<description>I understand what you&#039;re saying about people being able to walk away with their own interpretation when it comes to the replicant vs non-replicant argument. Still, I do not understand why sci fi geeks can&#039;t accept that he is a replicant. The fact is, Deckard is a replicant. Ridley Scott has said very directly and clearly that Deckard is a replicant. He is the director. If he says that is what it is, then it has more weight than a sci-fi geek who beats off to Daryl Hannah. If I paint a picture and tell you that it is a dog but you want it to be a seal, does that mean it is a seal?   I look forward to your next blog about how Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants is a futuristic war movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand what you&#8217;re saying about people being able to walk away with their own interpretation when it comes to the replicant vs non-replicant argument. Still, I do not understand why sci fi geeks can&#8217;t accept that he is a replicant. The fact is, Deckard is a replicant. Ridley Scott has said very directly and clearly that Deckard is a replicant. He is the director. If he says that is what it is, then it has more weight than a sci-fi geek who beats off to Daryl Hannah. If I paint a picture and tell you that it is a dog but you want it to be a seal, does that mean it is a seal?   I look forward to your next blog about how Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants is a futuristic war movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
