Knowing (2009) Movie Review
Knowing (2008) Movie, Sci-Fi Movie News, Sci-Fi Reviews — By Nix on March 20, 2009
You don’t get more hit-and-miss than Nicolas Cage. The prolific actor seems to be in three or four movies a year, and it’s usually a good year if one of his films turns out to be a moderate hit. Nicolas Cage movies without the words “National” or “Treasure” in the title just don’t seem to do very well at the box office nowadays. Cage’s latest, the Alex Proyas-directed “Knowing” doesn’t seem to have the makings of a big hit, and early indicators (including a general lack of buzz in the fanboy community) are that it will turn out like Cage’s last sci-fi themed effort, the Philip K. Dick inspired “Next”. I kind of enjoyed “Next” myself, but then again, I might have been the only one.
In “Knowing”, Cage plays John Koestler, a widowed MIT professor still pining for his wife who died in a fire recently. Koestler has a son, Caleb (Chandler Canterbury), a curious boy with a slight hearing impairment who is also not dealing very well with his mother’s passing. The Koestlers’ isolated life (their only connections to the outside world that exists beyond their grief are John’s sister Grace (Nadia Townsend) and a co-worker at MIT) gets complicated when, during the unearthing of a time capsule at Caleb’s school, the young boy comes into possession of a letter containing what seems to be a series of random numbers written by a curious girl name Lucinda (Lara Robinson) at the same school 50 years earlier. During one of his drunken nights, the grief-stricken John takes an interest in Caleb’s time capsule find, and quickly realizes that the numbers are not random at all and have in fact been foretelling disasters for the last 50 years.
For John, the letter’s prophecies convince him that life and death are not as random as he originally thought. Not only has the letter foretold every disaster that has happened in the 50 years since it was written, but it also foretold the events that led to the death of John’s wife. Chance and fate and “shit happens”, it appears, are not nearly as fickle as John had come to believe. With the help of Lucinda’s daughter, single mother Diana (Rose Byrne), John attempts to discover the meaning of Lucinda’s final prediction, which seems to have ended prematurely. And what exactly do these prophecies have to do with the appearances of beach-blond strangers in black trenchcoats? And why do these mysterious figures seem to be whispering to Caleb as they once did to poor Lucinda, who was believed to have gone mad?
Surprisingly, for a movie being heavily sold as a CGI-heavy disaster film, much of “Knowing” seems content to be a character-driven suspense-thriller about a father and son dealing with the aftermath of a terrible lost. But don’t let that fool you; this is very much a big-budget Hollywood film, and it can do CGI disasters pretty well, too. The trailers have already given away one crucial sequence in the movie which occurs at the end, but before that, there are two major set pieces, one involving a plane crash and the other in a New York subway. The plane crash is brutal and amazing, shot in a style that reminds you Alex Proyas is a visual filmmaker of notable skill when he’s not allowing battling robots to run amok onscreen. “Knowing” may be rated PG-13, but I would imagine the plane crash might have pushed the boundaries of that rating mightily.
One thing that does bode poorly for “Knowing” is that audiences may be expecting more “Armageddon”-esque disaster sequences from the film, and who can blame them, as the trailers certainly promises that kind of devastation. Alas, it is not that kind of film. The plane crash and the subway sequence really accounts for all the disasters that happens in the film until the climax. Instead, Proyas has managed to craft a nice suspense-thriller with well-drawn characters and heavy elements of sci-fi (especially at the end). Although he’s never tackled the genre before, Proyas should definitely consider doing a horror movie at least once in his career. There are a couple of incredibly intense, spooky sequences in “Knowing” that took me by surprise.
The script by Proyas and his co-writers spend enough quality time with the Koestlers that we come to care about father and son as events progress out of control and ominous fate threatens to swallow them. The appearance of the Whisper People further adds mystery to the film, and we’re never really sure what is going on. The Big Reveal that explains everything will either have you chuckling or gazing in wonderment at the screen, or a mixture of both. To be honest, I’m still not sure what to think of the Big Reveal. I still can’t decide if it’s a major cop-out or a pretty slick twist that saves the day. You’ll have to decide for yourself when you see it.
“Knowing” is certainly more character-oriented than a lot of its peers, and a lot of that credit goes to Cage, who is excellent in the lead. In fact, this might be one of Cage’s better acting works in a long while. I do have issues with Rose Byrne’s character, though, specifically the lack of depth. The script seems to have only two gears for Byrne’s Diana – utterly confused and scared, and utterly frantic and scared. The role as written could have been played by anyone, and it’s a shame Byrne wasn’t given more to do. Still, the script gets credit for not taking the obvious route with the Wayland character, in particular her relationship with John, which never becomes cliché. They are simply two single parents who have teamed up to uncover the truth because it means saving their children, and kudos to the film for never forcing a contrived romance.
In a lot of ways, “Knowing” exceeded my expectations. I went into it expecting a CGI-filled disaster movie with explosions every few second, but instead got a terrifically paced suspense-thriller with well-drawn characters. Proyas continues to impress with his visual acumen, and certainly the airplane crash and its raw, immediate aftermath is one of “Knowing’s” highlights. The film is a bit of a slow-mover at the beginning, but it does pick up steam and builds toward an unpredictable Third Act, before settling into a curiously muted conclusion. You expect a movie about the end of the world to go out with a bang, but “Knowing” and Alex Proyas have other ideas.
Alex Proyas (director) / Ryne Douglas Pearson, Juliet Snowden, Stiles White, Stuart Hazeldine, Alex Proyas (screenplay)
CAST: Nicolas Cage … John Koestler
Chandler Canterbury … Caleb Koestler
Rose Byrne … Diana Wayland
D.G. Maloney … The Stranger
Lara Robinson … Lucinda Embry / Abby Wayland
Nadia Townsend … Grace Koestler
Alan Hopgood … Rev. Koestler



Digg It
Stumble It
Tweet It
delicious
RSS




11 Comments
I am surprised that more people (read reviewers) did not pick up on the tie in to the Eziekel’s wheel story from the bible, especially given the fact that John’s father was a minister. The question for me was were these beings from another (secular) world, or in fact angels from God saving the last vestage of the human race. Great movie, great effects and great “after the movie” thinking time.
This movie was absolutely amazing! I had a feeling that this was a winner and it was everything that I had hoped for and more. It was just entirely intelligent. I normally despise intense movies or sci-fi, but this was so much more than that. The tie-in with the biblical ideas, and sci-fi was something that I found tasteful and wonderful. Deifnitely one of the best movies I have ever seen.
I loved the movie just as much, towards the middle and end of the movie it got me thinking big time and i was surprised other people didnt catch it. But i was blown away, it sure did relate to the bible. On how the world was coming to an end. And how those voices the kids heard…it was like the children were the apostles being told by god or his angels that the world was coming to an end to let everyone know about it. And those who were “chosen” or heard were the ones who were saved and the rest to be burned and die in earth who didnt listen. So in the last seen it makes sense how they saved and were brought into a new life/new begging like adam and eve in paradise.
if you was to do some research on the Mayan calendar and the date of 2012 and the planet x you would see key facts portrayed in this movie, the reference to the bible was very good.
Under intense studying i have found that the bible is a reproduction of some Sumerian text rewrote throughout history almost like Chinese whispers but some still true to its original meaning IE we were made in the image of the creator said in Sumerian texts and in the bible, but the creator was said to be beings from another planet (planet x) according to the Sumerians who wrote this 6000 years ago after mapping the galaxy in supreme accuracy with a planet not yet discovered by modern man at the moment, we were made to be slaves to mine the resources of a our planet to sustain the workings of the planet x but as its orbit is one of 36000 years evolution steps in and the slaves breed uncontrollably and use the resources of earth to their own needs becoming smarter but not by a lot we were made in the image of the creator not given full access to the mental power of the creators hence why we only use 11% of the brain when at full capacity so what better way to control the slaves when the creator returns but to wipe out 90% of the over grown population 10% that survives will be easy to control as you know humans are very resilient and when the creators come back they would not be greeted with open arms willing them to rules us again and now that man has the threat of nuclear weapons there would be no peaceful resolve so to melt the ice caps and cause a great flood (Noah the bible) would greatly increase the chance that the creators have of re dominating the earth. The Mexican government has already declared that UFO’s exist as they plague the sky’s of their country, the same country that had a civilization as good as modern man does today 4000 years ago, I could go on forever But great movie yeah if only we all could become self informed
I enjoyed the movie overall, although I agree the Diana Wayland character was kind of oddly written (or directed, or acted). I thought Nicholas Cage was quite good, as was the young man playing his son.
The airliner crash was pretty wrenching to watch, and very well executed. It reminded me of some set pieces in “Children of Men”, where the CGI is used almost invisibly – in the sense that you have these drawn-out scenes where the characters are moving through, and interacting with, real and enhanced elements in a very “matter of fact” way.
I’m not sure about the ending, I think I need to see it again. In some weird way, it was not quite as “magical” or “majestic” as it might have been, at least for me. I liked the idea behind the ending, pulling together major themes from the Bible and science fiction as it did.
So recently saw this movie, and I’d recommend it to anyone looking for movie to see.. but I’m a bit confused as to the ideas behind it, are these ‘whisperers’ aliens or angels? or both? also, the part at the end with the chosen being taken to a new planet makes me think..is the idea that these aliens/angels know when the world is going to end, or do they cause the worlds end?
I went in with neutral expectations, and very quickly tired of the Cage character…did not care for his personal problems or history, and his tendency to be in a zone of his own, you want to reach inside the movie and slap him around a few times…while the cgi effects are fantastic, any movie that shows the end of the world is not going to be a successful movie. I cannot recommend it, and there goes your word of mouth. Maybe a one hour episode of the Twilight zone might have worked, but not on a big budget movie…I must say however, the first half was interesting, but again I did not care for the Cage character.
It has to be one of the most strangests I have seen Yet. Coming from Hollywood. I did not expect it to be a real religous film. The sad is most of us are not tuned into history or even Prophecy. Although Numerology is a study of numbers. You can learn from it, not learn from it but the action packed scenes left me on the edge of the seat at times. If you watch Jack Van Impe presents on a regular basis. People would know that awful times are ahead. We have the conflict in the middle East about to exlpode into chaos. America’s values are in decline with socialism being called good.
Toss around whatever historic texts out their painting a supreme creator being from another planet. Claiming Earth is a slave colony mining natural resourses. You will end up being labeled a paranoid conspiracy theorist so enough with the red herrings. Your not fully thinking outside the box. We should all remember, those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it.
The movie overall message is that we must come together as a society with families coming back together or perish in a Apocalyptic event. I am somewhat disappointed that they show the beings in black trenchcoats as being a bit synister.
In the end the film sends a mixed message that only children will be saved and forget the bible believing christians that are adults. What do they know? Huh?
I dont know if its a religious movie and a scientific movie… but they have made some good “not so direct” references to the bible and the most debated co-existence of science and religion. I like how the aliens were created to depict angel like appearance… basically no body knows what angels look like, and I would assume they do not have humanly characteristics but just probably a human silhouette… which is whats shown in the movie, with divine light of course… and mystical beautiful wings.
The ending was awesome… the shot of ONE SINGLE tree… I cannot believe nobody caught that… Tree of Good and evil… Genisis gonna start all over again! :) dunnn dunnn dunnnn…!!
I watched the Blu-Ray DVD of the movie a second time last night. I'll probably watch it a third time. When I first saw the film, I too was expecting an Armageddon-esque, CGI thrill ride; in fact, that's what I was hoping for–some big, dumb fun at the end of a tortuous day in the real world. What I got was a surprise: a character-driven thriller and some very good acting by Nicholas Cage (remember Ghost Rider?). The second viewing allowed me to enjoy some of the finer points that established Cage's character: the icepick-in-your-chest pain of seeing the video of his dead wife; the decidedly non-action star way in which he handled the snub-nosed revolver; the s*#@ happens dissociation in the classroom. All good stuff. The ending left me a little lacking, but it beats the typical deus-ex-machina crap that Hollywood usually chucks on us. Hey… any reasonably intelligent person (and EVERY unreasonable numbskull) can find something to absolutely love or absolutely hate about absolutely everything. It's a movie. I was entertained.