<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SciFiCool.com &#124; No Anal Probing Involved &#187; Sci-Fi Featured Articles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scificool.com/category/sci-fi-featured-articles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scificool.com</link>
	<description>The Latest Science Fiction Movie, TV, and Comic Book news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:34:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Your Sunday Sci-Fi Science Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.scificool.com/your-sunday-sci-fi-science-fix/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scificool.com/your-sunday-sci-fi-science-fix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>endymi0n</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scificool.com/?p=11500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since most of your Sci-Fi movie and television news makers are busy sacrificing virgins or puppies or practicing whatever religion allows them the supernatural powers to get rich and famous, mostly producing crap, Sunday can be a desert planet of news, barren and lifeless.
But all is not lost. Remember, it&#8217;s called Science-Fiction for a reason. And so, since our readers have neural networks with a few more connections than are necessarily needed for prepping for Steelers-Bengals or finally putting that load of laundry in the dryer that you put in the washing machine on Tuesday, I bring you your Sunday Sci-Fi Science Fix, a column chocked full of nerd with hopefully cinematic themes of aliens, exploration or mass destruction.
Exoplanetary Hunters Find Easy Way To Seek Out Alien Worlds
Up until now, astronomers have been using the (maybe) slightly uncertain technique of detecting planets around other stars by measuring a planets mass effect on the movement of the parent star. Since stars [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scificool.com/your-sunday-sci-fi-science-fix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Guys Who Can Replace Will Smith in ID4 2</title>
		<link>http://www.scificool.com/5-guys-who-can-replace-will-smith-in-id4-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scificool.com/5-guys-who-can-replace-will-smith-in-id4-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nate Kimmey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Independence Day 2 Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Movie News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scificool.com/?p=10733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days ago, Roland Emmerich announced that he has a &#8220;really good story&#8221; for Independence Day 2, a project mentioned years ago that has not really gained any steam until recently. A lot of excitement was generated by Emmerich with this new script, though there is one catch: Will Smith is considered a &#8220;gross player&#8221;, and Emmerich won&#8217;t do the movie without him. Fox is currently reluctant to pay so much money for superstar Will Smith &#8211; who was much less popular when the original movie was made in 1996. But could the movie work without it&#8217;s star? Here are five actors who could potentially replace Smith in Independence Day 2.
5. Dwayne Johnson
Better known as &#8220;The Rock&#8221;, Johnson makes this list mainly because of his experience with action movie. His role in The Scorpion King was his first starring one, and several critics commented that his performance &#8220;held the movie together&#8221;. Unfortunately, &#8220;The Rock&#8221; likely wouldn&#8217;t be able to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scificool.com/5-guys-who-can-replace-will-smith-in-id4-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stargate Universe: The Worst Stargate Yet, the Best of the Worst, or Somewhere In-Between?</title>
		<link>http://www.scificool.com/stargate-universe-the-worst-stargate-yet-or-the-best-of-the-worst/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scificool.com/stargate-universe-the-worst-stargate-yet-or-the-best-of-the-worst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi TV News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stargate: Universe TV Series]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scificool.com/?p=10578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take a glance at our reader comments section on our &#8220;Stargate: Universe&#8221; posts, and you&#8217;ll start to notice a couple of patterns: loyal fans of the previous two &#8220;Stargate&#8221; shows have almost no interest in the new &#8220;Universe&#8221; show besides going out of their way to call it every name in the book; meanwhile, non-fans of the franchise have grappled onto &#8220;Universe&#8221; but in doing so are making it be known that the previous two incarnations were utter shit in their opinion. And then there are those guys in-between, like me. 
As a fan of &#8220;Stargate: SG1&#8243; (I have seen every single episode more than once), but only a casual fan of &#8220;Stargate: Atlantis&#8221; (more of the same to me, but without the characters I loved), I approached &#8220;Universe&#8221; with great trepidation. Then the pilot aired, and as you can tell from my review, I dug it. In my opinion it has great potential, and its pluses far outweigh any [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scificool.com/stargate-universe-the-worst-stargate-yet-or-the-best-of-the-worst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sci-Fi&#8217;s Top 5 Toughest Gals</title>
		<link>http://www.scificool.com/sci-fis-top-5-toughest-gals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scificool.com/sci-fis-top-5-toughest-gals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 07:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Basil Murad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Babes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scificool.com/?p=6604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no denying the contribution these characters have made to a genre otherwise dominated by men, and this list represents five of my favorite star hoppin&#8217;, cyborg bustin&#8217; and alien blastin&#8217; women in all the universe. They are bold, resourceful, intelligent, sexy and tough as nails. I know I wouldn&#8217;t mess with them that&#8217;s for sure, but enough jabbering on. Let&#8217;s get down to business.
 
5. Dana Scully of X-Files
The constantly skeptical and always serious Agent Scully certainly had her plate full. After being partnered with Fox &#8216;Spooky&#8217; Mulder her life would never be the same, and she endured more than a lifetime&#8217;s fair share of danger while barely flinching through it all. Could you do that? I don&#8217;t think so. It&#8217;s true that most people didn&#8217;t take to Scully until about the second season of the show, mostly because of how cold she was toward Mulder who was admittedly more likable. It didn&#8217;t take long however for her to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scificool.com/sci-fis-top-5-toughest-gals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Beginner&#8217;s Guide To Essential Sci-Fi At The Movies</title>
		<link>http://www.scificool.com/your-beginner-guide-to-essential-sci-fi-at-the-movies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scificool.com/your-beginner-guide-to-essential-sci-fi-at-the-movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>endymi0n</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek Universe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars Universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scificool.com/?p=5518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can see you out there, hovering over your keyboard, slack jawed, staring with squinty questioning eyes into your bright LCD screen, yearning for something new. Thus far your movie watching existence has been confined to the clinically brain dead genres of the romantic comedy, the buddy movie or films starring Ben Affleck. Something has to give.
You&#8217;d like to branch out, stretch the neurons out a little, watch something that doesn&#8217;t find you vacant eyed and drooling some short time after the opening credits. Desperate, you consulted The Google and typed in &#8220;Movies that won&#8217;t make me stupid&#8221;.
The Google provided a list of possibilities but there are many choices, some with frightening titles like &#8220;THX 1138&#8243;, &#8220;12 Monkeys&#8221; or &#8220;Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind&#8221;. For the challenge a growing mind really needs there is really only Science Fiction movies. Science Fiction, sometimes to it&#8217;s destruction, is not afraid to go there. Most Science Fiction movies assume you have both [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scificool.com/your-beginner-guide-to-essential-sci-fi-at-the-movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robots And Rapture: The Shiny And Sexy Occupants Of Our Possible Futures</title>
		<link>http://www.scificool.com/robots-and-rapture-the-shiny-and-sexy-occupants-of-our-possible-futures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scificool.com/robots-and-rapture-the-shiny-and-sexy-occupants-of-our-possible-futures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>endymi0n</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Babes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Odds and Ends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scificool.com/?p=4318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robots are the ultimate Sci-Fi sex objects. While the human female can be as perfect, they come with certain disadvantages, like free will and a healthy suspicion of males. Synthetic females in film and television seem designed for no guilt attraction. Most are engineered to pass entirely as women, while some wear their feminine chrome in plain view. Disguised, a beautiful bot can perform many tasks, including deluding stupid and smitten males for the brief time it will require for them to be probed, sampled, interrogated or terminated.
What other tasks a girl robot may wish or be programmed to perform we can leave up to your imagination. Here are a few of the sexiest robots on film and television.
Angelina Jolie In Cyborg 2
This was Angelina&#8217;s first grown up movie role. In it she played a secret agent bot and an occasionally naked one. Soon she was forced to be on the run after she discovered she was about to be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scificool.com/robots-and-rapture-the-shiny-and-sexy-occupants-of-our-possible-futures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
